Liberal Americans misunderstand the appeal of Trump at their own peril

Political Spectrum
It’s like Myers-Briggs, but with real-world consequences. Like actual warfare.

For the record, I do not support Trump. Not even a little bit. I find him to be an insufferable buffoon whose only contribution to society is an unintentionally hysterical Twitter feed, wherein the sheer frequency of his retweets of white supremacist conspiracy theories is reason enough to disqualify him from holding any government position of any kind. I wouldn’t trust him with installing a park bench, much less safeguarding the nuclear codes.

But there’s a narrative that has taken impenetrable shape among the American left at the moment, which is that Trump is the inevitable result of decade after decade of pent-up white rage, spilling out in a toxic morass of racist, homophobic, sexist, nationalist fervor. These people, liberals say, are freaked out about how the United States is becoming a more open, tolerant, and diverse nation, and are shouting and screaming to hold onto their position of power before it’s too late.

This exact narrative, for some reason, has been applied to several entirely unrelated events, from Trump, to GamerGate, to Ghostbusters, for some reason. In every case, it is grossly mistaken. And in the case of Trump, it is downright dangerous.

If the only disagreement that an anti-Trump protestor is able to muster is “you’re so racist!” then they’d better be prepared to look like a complete idiot, because many of the Trump supporters are going to be well-prepared with a library of actual arguments that’ll demolish these antics and relegate the tactic of childish name-calling to the pathetic refuge of the desperate and stupid where it belongs. In fact, they are already doing so. And in many cases, they are winning.

That’s right, people. Trump supporters occasionally have actual arguments. And ignoring this indisputable fact is only going to make them entrench deeper into their chosen camp if all anyone can do in response is to call them a bunch of homophobes.

Now, I must clarify: I do not think Trump is the answer to their prayers. See paragraph 1. But if you want people not to vote for Trump, shouting at them is a stupid thing to do. But if you don’t have a single clue as to what the hell they stand for, that’s all you’ll be able to do, and you shall be destined to fail. Just take a look at all the anti-Trump protests, and how utterly worthless they have been this whole time.

Here’s a tip: If you’re going to accomplish nothing, you might as well do nothing.

A better strategy, as any non-idiot would tell you, is to actually learn what the hell they have to say. Not only is this far more effective in terms of being able to debate the issues, but, as an added bonus, this does not take particularly long.

Here are the major issues concerning Trump supporters, as I see them:

Trump issue #1: We’re getting screwed over by trade deals

People can make fun of Trump manufacturing his clothing line in China all they want, but a single business moving production back to the States isn’t going to do much of anything for the overall problem. A lot of people think that sending manufacturing jobs off to China has decimated the middle class, and, combined with the outrageous expense of college tuition these days, this is a huge concern. Not only are a lot of low-skilled jobs gone, but the high-skilled jobs are often out of reach. Without a path toward economic stability readily available for a wide range of people, we are in for some painful years, and a great deal of social unrest.

Is there a way to get those jobs back? Maybe, maybe not. Some of those are low-skilled jobs that are awful anyway, so maybe we can let those go. But some of the higher-skill manufacturing jobs, the kind that have the potential to pay well, might be the perfect answer for the non-college-educated, working-class people who just want to go into work every day and make a decent living. Failing that, perhaps we could look into alternatives, such as significantly lowering the cost of college education, so more people could participate in the mid-to-high-end job market. We’d also have to improve the pre-college public education system significantly for this to be most effective, which would be helpful on its own.

But this problem will not be solved by just calling people sexist.

Trump argument #2: We’re getting screwed over by immigration

This is a contentious issue, and I’ve seen conflicting pieces of information regarding it. One side says immigrants are taking all the low-end jobs, while the other side says immigrants are taking all the jobs wealthier people don’t want to do anyway. I am inclined to agree with the latter, but again…this is not a convincing argument for those who agree with the former.

I expect the solution would be to improve the economic situation of every country across the globe, but that’s not going to happen within a single election cycle. But those who feel like they are losing out to what they view as a fairly tolerant immigration policy need alternative job prospects, not just pointless rhetoric. Perhaps something like raising the minimum wage would help, because then there’d be no reason for people to get frustrated with immigrants willing to work for lower wages, who are then seen as lowering the wages of everyone around them in doing so.

But this problem will not be solved by just calling people racist.

Trump argument #3: PC culture is destroying America

I hate to side with the man on anything, but Trump is 100% right on this one. Political correctness is not merely, as certain people will tell you, “treating people with respect.” It has become such a pervasive force that certain issues can never be discussed, no matter what, for fear of offending people who will take to the streets and shout about it, or worse.

Europe, for example, is having a severe problem right now with politically motivated crackdowns on “hate speech,” which consist of little more than “perhaps all these people coming from other countries with radically different values compared to ours might be cause for concern.” Speech like this is censored from social media, removed from newspapers, and, in some cases, those who dared say such things are threatened with jail time. Really.

Truth is not hate speech. It never was, and never will be. The battle of ideas needs to be won with better ideas, not with scare tactics and censorship. If you can’t win on the strength of your arguments, you deserve to lose.

And this problem will not be solved by just calling people homophobic.

That said, Trump is not the answer. Anyone who looks to a man who’s infamous for suing anyone who says mean things about him and thinks “this guy is totally going to fight for freedom of speech!” is a sadly mistaken individual.

But if the left continues with the narrative of calling everyone a racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, whatever-phobic bigot, those people…who know they have actual reasons for being on that side…are just going to say FUCK YOU.

It happened with Brexit, for exactly the same reasons listed above. Can it happen again, in the United States?

I don’t know. But that’s enough for me.

Start listening, lefties. Before it’s too late.

About SnarkyNomad

Eytan is a pretentious English major whose rant-laden sarcastic tirades occasionally include budget travel tips and other international nonsense. You can follow his every narcissistic word on Facebook or Twitter.

View all posts by SnarkyNomad

46 Comments on “Liberal Americans misunderstand the appeal of Trump at their own peril”

  1. I’m more concerned about what comes after Trump on the right-side and what comes after Clinton on the left side. These two candidates demonstrate how meaningless party-politics has become and how similar these parties are when it comes to the economy, corporatism, and permanent war.

    1. I think there’s something going on right now, on both sides, which is going to screw up a lot of things. On the right, there’s the split between “traditional” conservatives, and the alt-right (which isn’t discussed as accurately in the media as what it actually is; I’m not saying I like it, but people are bad-mouthing it for inaccurate reasons, and if you’re going to bad-mouth something, as least be accurate about it).

      Over on the left, there’s a fissure that will eventually split the party in two, between classic liberals, and progressives, the latter of which are now being labelled “regressives” or the “regressive left” by those who still consider themselves classic liberals. They claim the regressive left is pro-censorship, pro-discrimination (in favor of everyone who isn’t white, male, etc), and directly contradictory to liberal values.

      Eventually both parties will split in two, if these problems aren’t solved immediately; or, perhaps more likely, they’ll simply morph into an amalgamation between the two, and do their best to carry on.

      1. I think that split on the left would only happen if those progressives put the the movement (such as it is) over a single personalities (such as Bernie Sanders) and choose to not betray their goals. Sanders shows the limit of movement oriented around a person because the leverage the movement had has been effectively blunted. .Classic liberals pretty much give lip-service to concerns of these progressives and don’t really want to really change anything in a fundamental way. Classic liberals worldwide are losing their appeal i think because of this very reason. They are all talk and token gestures. If these progressives stand firm then maybe there’s a split.

  2. A web forum where political discourse can seamlessly (no pun intended) transfer over to a discussion of the merits of travel pants nomenclature and the market value of marino wool tees, practically mid-paragraph, is they type of forum I can appreciate. Good work, all.

    1. Hmm, not the usual type of comment. Personally I think this is my blog and I can blather about whatever I want (especially since travel to me has a great deal to do with what’s going on in the world, which is why I consider political topics acceptable), but not so many people agree. Thanks for the support, though.

  3. Thanks for sharing.

    My largest concern with Trump is his (possible) nationalistic/protectionist position that could stall economic growth. Sure his unfiltered mouth is less than desirable, it’s actions and policies that greatly concern me. While some of his policies will be pro-growth, it is others that concern me.

    I wrote about those concerns and thought you might be interested.

    1. I agree. I can understand why people want manufacturing jobs to come back to the US, and I want to see the same thing, but I’m not sure he has a functional plan. China is good at mass production of relatively simple products, but other countries have maintained an advantage in manufacturing more complex machinery. Cars, for example. If we’re going to bring back manufacturing jobs, it’s probably not going to be through setting up a t-shirt factory or something.

  4. And since you wrote that, there’s been a lot more of the inanity on both sides. I appreciate the occasional post like this because I’d otherwise be completely ignorant. I never go looking for political stuff because so much of it from either side is the sort of garbage you’ve described. (When it’s not outright lies.)

    1. The “fake news” thing is going to turn everyone into a vicious witch hunter, constantly accusing everyone else of fake news. It’s going to get ugly. Thanks for your appreciate comments, though. I’ll do my best.

    1. The problem is that liberalism has morphed into “progressivism,” which is radically different and shouldn’t be lumped into the same category. Sadly, that’s where we are. I hope the pushback in favor of old-fashioned liberal values continues to gain traction.

  5. The ‘Progressives’ today are the ones that support and promote/worship child-slaughter and sodomy…and mass Muslim migration. Things will not get better. Trump may be able to fix our economy perfectly (which he’s almost already done!) but it’s all coming down….better read “Left Behind” so you’ll know what to do when all hell breaks loose. Amazon…$32 for the 12 book set on Kindle. Watch for the 10 nation …one world government/religion. If you are a Christian you can look forward to this….

    “Behold, the day of the Lord cometh and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee. For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. Then shall the Lord go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle…And the Lord shall be king over all the earth: in that day shall there be one Lord, and his name one.” (Zechariah 14:1,2,3…9)

    But if you’re not a Christian, you have nothing to look forward to. Ever.

  6. The Right wasn’t upset over “decades” of political frustration. We elected Trump because we were horrified over having to withstand 8 years of a traitor for a president, the worst mistake Americans ever made.

    One word of advice to the Left. Try real hard to start believing in reality, where the reality is…marriage is between one man and one woman and homosexual behavior is a gross sin, an abomination and a vile affection (Lev 18:22/Romans 1:26), and where people want the bloody slaughter of our unborn to stop, where we don’t want our president to give 150 Billion dollars to Hezbollah in Iran or cozy up to Russia in its effort to help Syria annihilate Israel. ETC. In other words, get real, because the Right is not having any of the Left’s phony “diversity”…and all their other antichrist activity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.